1.
the justified, lawful use of reasonable force to protect oneself, others, or property from an imminent threat of unlawful harm.
2.
An affirmative legal argument that a defendant, due to severe mental disease or defect at the time of a crime, could not understand their actions or distinguish right from wrong.
3.
layered approach to personal safety that prioritizes avoiding and de-escalating danger before resorting to physical force.
4.
An affirmative defense in criminal law, arguing that a defendant was forced to commit a crime due to an immediate, unlawful threat of death or serious bodily injury to themselves or others, leaving no reasonable opportunity to escape.
5.
Occurs when law enforcement induces an otherwise law-abiding person to commit a crime they were not otherwise inclined to commit. It requires proving that the government originated the criminal intent, rather than just providing an opportunity, often thro
6.
Proving the accused was elsewhere when the crime occurred.
7.
defenses involve admitting to the act but presenting additional facts that excuse or justify the conduct. Common examples include self-defense, necessity, duress, and insanity.
8.
of evidence A straightforward defense involves challenging the prosecution’s case by highlighting the lack of evidence supporting the charges. This may involve questioning witness credibility, challenging forensic evidence, or demonstrating weak investig
9.
A defense for children (typically under age 7 or 14) who lack the legal capacity to form criminal intent
