1.
Material, typically of a sexual nature, that is considered to be offensive, lewd, or morally repugnant, and is not protected by the First Amendment.
2.
False statements, spoken or written, that harm the reputation of an individual or entity, potentially leading to legal action for damages.
3.
Direct personal insults or offensive language that is likely to provoke a violent reaction, and is not protected by the First Amendment.
4.
Non-verbal expressions or actions that convey a particular message or viewpoint, such as burning a flag or wearing an armband, and are protected under the First Amendment.
5.
Expressions that promote violence, discrimination, or prejudice against individuals/groups based on attributes like race, ethnicity, religion, or other protected characteristics. While generally protected, may be subject to regulation in certain context.
6.
Government actions or policies that seek to prevent speech or expression from occurring before it takes place, a practice disfavored by the First Amendment.
7.
Speech related to advertising, marketing, or promoting a product or service, which receives a lower level of protection compared to other forms of expression.
8.
Regulations or restrictions on speech that do not target the specific content or viewpoint of the expression, but may control the time, place, or manner in which it occurs.
9.
The highest level of judicial review applied when a law or regulation restricts protected speech, requiring the government to demonstrate a compelling interest and narrow tailoring.
10.
A level of judicial review applied to content-neutral regulations, which requires the government to show that the regulations serve a significant government interest and leave open ample alternative channels for communication.
11.
It's presumptively unconstitutional for the government to place burdens on speech due to content. To justify such regulation, the government must show it is necessary to serve a compelling state interest and is narrowly drawn to achieve it.
