LOGICAL REASONING

Edit Answers
SWJKSKOZFGURDCYXKEYEYSGEX NYSCCDDQUZSZIBWNWBVMKYANQ OGYROREAZXJTXNKLHJIIUSOVP IOVSTNOIJKCOEWEDODJWDIPUO TLCXYHCDLCDJLRIAVGLTTEPTL AAKOJLELEANYSCESFUIATPNAF ZNTOHBLOUDCREEGODAZCMECCE IARDZEKORSUISXCZTIDVTICAE LEAASZSSGYICFPNOLYUHRYYTE ASELJWSICIOOTMIAHFPOFQZNM RLFJEIKSVISBNIRNXEGIEIEEE EAOQZPNUSEEMSEVIDERXNRAMN NFTZFSRFDJDNNEEETUWEFGUUI EOLWTCLGESTETSRAJRCBNXNGM GMACXWDNTRGVIICVSZTTZCMRO YYEFRHHIJJEMCIFKARGBICEAH THPCLBSNYPENETIIHTQNKVXJD SHPDZXIOCRRUCBJNCYIFOLEWA AJAEASESPYKBZEGHEFLOWVNLV HRRUZZHAHSUOICALLAFONRPTP PYDTAMMELIDESLAFPLHPGXDQV UQWMODZRZLGAPZFHICSAJIWMF FQKFQMQQJBSCQREEYCAXSCCQX JBDNOLGBNIEFBRDCFIVSRMOAH VVZDYOPBHFOZAHNFJFTGUCMML
1.
The study of correct reasoning
2.
The quality where ideas stick together logically
3.
The process of thinking to reach a conclusion
4.
Reasoning from general to specific conclusions
5.
Reasoning from specific observations to general conclusions
6.
Incorrect or misleading reasoning
7.
A three-step logical argument introduced by Aristotle
8.
A statement that supports a conclusion
9.
The final statement derived from reasoning
10.
A statement showing relationship between categories
11.
Facts or examples used to support a claim
12.
Information gathered through experience or senses
13.
A conclusion based on evidence and reasoning
14.
A general explanation based on repeated observations
15.
A set of statements supporting a conclusion
16.
A conclusion made from insufficient evidence
17.
Assuming all members of a group are the same
18.
Attacking the person instead of the argument
19.
Limiting options to only two when more exist
20.
Using weak comparisons to support an argument
21.
Using fear instead of evidence to persuade
22.
Logical flow where ideas are connected
23.
A broad statement based on specific cases
24.
Based on systematic observation and evidence
25.
Consistent and reasonable thinking